As technical authors, we strive to remove friction and use fewer words, making instructions clear and concise.
We do:
-
-
- Cut duplication.
- remove padding.
- Replace vagueness with precision;
- Replacing lengthy explanations with fewer words is often our crucial task.
-
Much of what we read—reports, emails, procedures, specifications—still contains unnecessary words. Using fewer words consistently improves clarity.
Wordiness is not sophistication.
It is inefficiency. Fewer words deliver ideas faster and more effectively.
In regulated environments, long-winded language introduces ambiguity. In engineering environments, it slows down decisions. In operational settings, it creates risks. Eliminating excess leads to fewer words, helping to prevent misunderstandings.
Clarity is not about “dumbing down.”
It is about control. Using fewer words achieves better control over the message.
Below are examples of overworked sentences, followed by sharper alternatives that use fewer words.
Three words instead of one
| Overworded: | Sharper: |
| Due to the fact that the system was not operational at this point in time, we were unable to proceed with the implementation process. | Because the system was down, we could not proceed.
|
| Remove empty phrases | |
| It should be noted that the team is currently in the process of reviewing the documentation. | The team is reviewing the documentation.
|
| Replace Word Clusters with a Single Word | |
| At this moment in time | Now |
| In the event that | If |
| For the purpose of | To |
| Make a decision | Decide |
| Cut Passive Padding | |
| A review of the policy was undertaken by the compliance team in order to ensure alignment with regulatory requirements. | The compliance team reviewed the policy to ensure compliance with regulatory requirements. |
| Remove Redundant Qualifiers | |
| The final outcome was completely unanimous among all stakeholders. | The decision was unanimous. |
| Reduce Abstract Language | |
| There is a requirement for the submission of documentation prior to commencement. | Submit the documentation before starting. |
Why This Matters?
Shorter sentences:
-
-
-
Reduce cognitive load
-
Improve comprehension
-
Reduce misinterpretation
-
Increase pace and authority
-
Improve audit traceability
-
-
In ISO-regulated environments, in defence documentation, in nuclear or PCI-controlled systems, excess wording creates ambiguity. Ambiguity creates risk. Choosing fewer words over length improves accuracy.
-
-
- You do not need more words to sound credible.
You need better ones. This is why fewer words often have a greater impact. - The discipline of a technical author is not just writing.
- It is subtraction.
- You do not need more words to sound credible.
-
A Practical Rule
-
-
- If you can remove a word without changing the meaning, remove it. Seek fewer words rather than more in each phrase.
- If you can replace three words with one precise term, do it.
- If a sentence runs over two lines, challenge it.
-
The strongest documents are rarely the longest ones. Indeed, fewer words often mean greater strength.
As technical authors, our job is not to impress.
It is to make meaning unavoidable.